Blood bowl 3 review Pc#

Except for the rules change, the way to play the game is the same now as it was. I liked the levelling up and the team selection, but with my football manager hat on I would have really liked to have been able to develop my team further and add in special players etc, which I never achieved.Īll in all, I enjoyed it, but BloodBowl, for me, works in BB2 and the game play is fairly straightforward. That said, the AI teams were far too easy to beat regularly and there always appeared to be an algorithm that resulted in far too many 1’s being rolled in one half of the game, only to be reversed with a plethora of 6’s in the other. The style of play was straight forward, with lots of double clicking if you wanted something confirmed, throwing and catching were easy and visually there wasn’t too much going on at any one time to confuse my simple mind. Elder Scrolls on the other hand, was based in the same arena but just added in too many complications so I found it was far less enjoyable.īloodBowl 2 on the console was the definition of playable. Grab a huge sword, some health potions and wander into any cave and vanquish your foes.

Blood bowl 3 review Pc#

To me there’s a fine balance between playability and complication.Īs an example, Skyrim is a superb game on PC or console, in as much as it’s huge but it can be played relatively easily. I was a huge fan of Football Manager over the years but when it got to the point where you could choose how long you wanted the grass and how wide the parking spaces were in the players car park, I lost interest. My amateur knowledge of 40k and Sigmar made me wary as every new version seemed to add additional features and generally seemed to make the playing style just a little bit more complicated. When the new version of BB was announced, both the board game and computer version, I was apprehensive.